can someone please explain to me why we've been holding afghan "suspected terrorists" in guantanamo for years now (who are in reality probably only people who pissed off their neighbors) and torturing them, but now we're letting the united arab emirates, a country with more easily defined ties to terrorism, run our ports? i mean, i guess we were only checking about one out of one hundred containers that came into the country anyway, so let's just let the u.a.e. and their billions in oil money jump right in there.
here's a thought... why don't we put iraq in charge of the ports? i mean, the current iraqi administration is pretty friendly to us on the whole (wink, wink), and i bet we could weed out the insurgents with a careful applicant screening process (question 1: how many i.e.d.'s have you made in the last three years?). it might also help them make some money to get out of the staggering debt they're in.
i've got another idea. let's put the saudis in charge of our airlines! 17 of 19 hijackers agree that saudi extremists keep their heads under pressure better than other fundamentalists.
what about yemen for our merchant marines?
north korea for our border patrol?
outsourcing... the (oppressor's) wave of the future.
fuck bush.
1 comment:
couldn't agree more, kimosabe.
-er, geronimo.
another example of the laserlike minds at work in the bush foreign policy advisory. caution: slow children.
Post a Comment